Some time ago the Swedish prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt made a statement that is not easily forgotten by people. It is Mr. Reinfeldt’s opinion that the ethnic Swedes are nothing but barbarians. The statement that Reinfeld said is used in same way in other European countries just replacing “Swedish” with the folk of that particular country.
It seems especially ridiculous to make such claim to somehow justify the extreme non-European mass immigration when all kinds of barbaric acts have been made towards females during this modern period of mass immigration. At least for about 1000 years Northern legislation had a rule specifically made against violence towards women. Let’s see who is the barbarian, Fredrik – for me such statement sounds even outrageous considering the facts – but what would the Swedish version of the Sheriff of Nottingham care about women’s safety issues as long as the tax money is filling the trunk.
A few years ago a woman in Oulu, Finland was raped by two Africans and her genitals were cut with scissors so badly it is impossible to recover from it.
Eva Helgetun, a 13-year-old Norwegian girl killed herself after being raped in her school by immigrants.
Elin Krantz, was raped and murdered by an Ethiopian immigrant just because of she was in wrong time in wrong place.
These are just a few individual cases, many of the other cases we never hear of. The truth is that in Scandinavia, non-European immigrants are strongly over-represented in rape statistics and such violence towards women is growing. Oslo, the capital city of Norway has been suffering even for “rape waves” committed by non-European immigrants. In Oslo women have been raped in bright day light and open in public places such as underground station and even in front of the Parliamentary building. It is easy task to connect the dots in this case – actually the dots have been already connected. Some people just want to shut their eyes and ears and sing – or scream – “Kumbaya” instead of doing their simple homework with connecting a dot to another one, something which makes the subject more difficult to be issued.
What is the politicians solution to this? They want that the ethnicity of the rapists or other criminals will be kept in secret – it is “wrong” to tell about it in the news. It might make people anti-immigration…and the same time they tell us that it is us who are the barbarians. Sounds pretty twisted.
When crimes towards females as a group were considerably rare before the modern period of mass immigration, the causality between the security risk of a woman becoming an offer of such heinous crime and amount of non-European immigration is clear. And considering the facts, the facts how raw these crimes can be – even purely sadistic, it is clear to me that it is not us who are the barbarians. For some reason, however, call it the goodness of the soul or missing the plain reasoning, so many European women are lacking the strength to stand up for themselves and their fellow-females. No, a woman does not even need to be politically active or a nationalist to stand up for oneself. However, we are offers as folk group as the offers of the crime most often are European females, and thus we need to stand up and oppose this phenomena as a group as well.
To some degree the media pressure can be blamed for so many women not being able to think about risks. When we have a clear over-representation of sexual crimes committed by certain ethnic groups, everyone is pressurized to think that if you don´t like or love and give your sympathy and such to these folk groups, you are a racist. When this is done in so heavy way and the facts of crime not talked with all the facts needed for the common people to realize the risks and the importance of being aware, we can’t just say ‘What a pity, she should had known better not to go there” when a crime happens. Of course, just “knowing” doesn´t work always as violence can happen randomly but overall how much of sexual crimes and other crimes towards females could had been avoided if media and politics worked to protect the possible offers instead of only protecting the committers of the crime! How it can be possible that such case as the one described above, the country of the origins of the immigrant is found to be too dangerous for the criminal with a high risk of repeating the crime is found to be too dangerous, and the danger towards the females of the ethnic group in the host country is totally ignored. Some supporters of multiculturalism use the argument “crime happens [also in the ethnic group of the host country]. However, it is pure lunacy to be importing crime and not excluding clear risks outside the society just in the name of “humanity”. Where is the humanity towards the women? Every rape is one too much, and many of them would had been avoided – even lives would had been saved – with better immigration policies. With better policies, the Finnish woman that got cut would be able to go to toilet normally. With better policies Eva Helgetun would still be alive, Elin Krantz would still be alive, as well as numerous others women – now they are just names we can read about instead of living young persons.
Caring about your own folk does not mean disclosure/shutting out humanity in the first place. What it points out, though, is that there has to be certain realism with decision-making, in which priorities has to be made. This means that the decision-making happens in the highest level by considering what is the best for the ethnic group of the host country – instead of worrying about sending the crime-repeater to the “destruction” (as his supporters would say, incredibly enough, even though the immigrants have a habit of sending their children to these places for “learning trips”) it is out of option to bring the destruction here and the destruction of the lives of so many European women. In such cases, other kind of solutions has to be sought. If we want to act in the name of humanity, we should take the help to the origin of the bad living conditions. It is already clear that the monetary costs of non-European immigration have been enormous, including immigrants fooling off money from the government and all kinds of projects that in the worst case lack of having any kind of practical end goal. The politicians and pro-immigration activists certainly lack to see the bigger picture, speak and act contradictive, when they, in the name of humanity, do whatever is required to get the immigration-project merry-go-round going on with all its costs, bringing help only to some, when there is much more people in need of help – material, psychological, nutritional – in their very place of being in their original countries. From nationalistic point of view, helping these people in their troublesome countries is not forbidden in any way. Just that the help does not happen in the cost of the well-being of our own ethnic groups and countries as it does at the moment.
Recently, a new book about “Finnish populistic far-right” has been hyped by the extreme left-wing authors of the book. They tell us that ethnocentric European and so-called “right-wingers” (which basically means anyone, who opposes the liberal and unrealistic and non-logical views of the supportes of the left and “Green” party) are anti-feminist. Yet that is again another quite non-logical claim. Feminism is about protecting and advocating women’s rights – including their rights for safety and freedom, rights to walk free without being afraid being raped, their rights to walk in what ever clothes they choose without being in a risk of being raped because their skirt was too short or because certain ethnic groups view that a woman who is not dressed in a whole body covering black bag is “free game” to touch, maltret and rape. Opposing immigration of potential rapists is not being anti-feminist. It is being pro-female rights. If someone is anti-female rights, it is these Kumbaya-singers.